Quickies: Gambia’s Anti-LGBT Crackdown, HRC Founder Arrested, Winnie the What?

Featured image: Winnie the Pooh via Disney

Previous post

Transgender Day of Remembrance 2014

Next post

Raise a Glass



Jac is a bisexual, genderqueer, feminist, godless liberal. They grew up in small town Pennsylvania and spent their adulthood exploring progressively larger and queerer cities. They currently work as an online tutor in the subjects of math, science and writing. When they are not tutoring or carrying out the gay agenda, they enjoy reading, cooking, science documentaries, and long walks on the beach.


  1. November 24, 2014 at 1:05 pm —


    So let me get this straight, Whinny the Poo is somehow inappropriate for children because you actually don’t see any genitalia on him? Wow, because I would think actually seeing sex organs on an anthropomorphized cartoon animal would be what would freak social conservatives out. Also what about other cartoons like Mickey and Minnie Mouse? Mickey doesn’t wear pants, and without their clothes and Minnie’s eyelashes you couldn’t tell which one is supposed to be a boy or a girl.

  2. November 24, 2014 at 1:17 pm —

    Mickey wears pants, but Donald Duck does not, nor do most of the Warner Brothers cartoons like Bugs and Daffy. What makes it all the more ridiculous is that the Pooh pals aren’t supposed to be real animals. They’re plush toys brought to life by Christopher Robbin’s imagination. They have seams. Eeyore’s tail is always falling off and needing to be pinned back on. So of course they don’t have genitalia. If all Polish plushies wear clothing as implied by that city council member, is that because they’re sewn to be anatomically correct?

    • November 24, 2014 at 1:20 pm —


      Sorry can’t believe I made that mistake. I remember what Mickey looks like. I must have gotten him confused with Donald Duck somehow.

      • November 24, 2014 at 1:27 pm —

        No biggie. I had to do an image search to find out which cartoons wore clothing. My childhood saturated by cartoon and stuffed animal nudity has inured me to it. Maybe I wouldn’t have grown up to be a godless queer if all of my toys and cartoons had been properly attired.

        • November 24, 2014 at 2:03 pm —


          Yes its a scientific fact that watching adorable bipedal, talking cartoon animals turns you gay. Those things are such evil perverts. I wonder how many nut jobs would support banning them on those grounds. Never mind that I love and still remain a cis gendered heterosexual male.

  3. November 25, 2014 at 12:50 pm —

    ” “This is very disturbing but can you imagine! The author was over 60 and cut [Pooh’s] testicles off with a razor blade because he had a problem with his identity,” she said.”

    This is… this is so absurd that I can hardly believe it.

  4. November 30, 2014 at 4:09 pm —

    Regarding toads (the mushroom folk of Mario), the general consensus is that they’re genderless because they’re fungi, though some Mario games have gendered them to some extent. (For instance, they clearly marry in Super Mario RPG—there’s a whole town that’s a tourist attraction for marriage—even though, again, they’re fungi and therefore don’t actually have sex per se.)

    Congrats to Evan Adams! I remember him as Thomas Builds-the-Fire. “Now that’s a fine example of the oral tradition.” Sherman Alexie is an ally, though he’s straight himself; he has written stories featuring gay content, including explicit sex, though. (Note that it depends, but among more traditional Indians, the ‘mostly straight’ types are more common than among mainstream society, though I can only speak for my personal experience as a Sioux in that regard.)

Leave a reply